Custom Map #3567: map 91 BIG CHESS. By: yum234

[AutoPost]

This topic is for discussion of map #3567: map 91 BIG CHESS


Author: yum234
Size: 250x180

Desc:

[D0m0nik]

Can't kep up with your maps at the moment Yum, not enough hours in the day!

This was another epic map, great work!

[yum-forum]

Can't kep up with your maps at the moment Yum, not enough hours in the day!

This was another epic map, great work!

Thank You! You are welcome!  :)

[GoodMorning]

Seconded.

New plan: Alter the Earth's rotation to extend CW playtime.

[stdout]

Thirded. Your maps are great yum! I love them all.

[mzimmer74]

Agreed!  I always look forward to trying out a new yum map.

[yum-forum]

Thank You, but rating not so high...

P.S. I like statistics. History of rating of this map:

7 9 10 9 10 9 10 10 9 10 10 (at that time rating 9.25  :) ) then
1 9 10 9 10 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 (at that time rating 9  :) :) ) then
1 9 1 9 9 9 1 9 9...
Almost 9, 10 and 1 (without playing game!  :( :( :( :( ). 

[GoodMorning]

Moral: Median rating is more useful than mean.

Also, if you look at CS sorted by rating, nothing stays at 9+.

Anything above 6 is worth extending, and above 7.5 is very good indeed.

Remember that the forum is the true measure (as far as these things go).

[Builder17]

How often you Yum check rating in your newest map(s)? :O

And yeah , I agree median could be more stable against haters cause it stays at middlest rating always.

[stdout]

Yes, ignore all rankings of 1.

[yum-forum]

How often you Yum check rating in your newest map(s)? :O

And yeah , I agree median could be more stable against haters cause it stays at middlest rating always.

For all new maps. Easy script.  ;)

Instead of median rating I already posted simple administration way - not permit rate a map without submitting a score!
Almost all of my rate "1" was without playing and submitting score! And in Your case (maps) I also noticed that several maps (when rating becomes high) was rated "1" without playing game...

[yum-forum]

Yes, ignore all rankings of 1.

I can not ignore. I need feedback. And problem of haters is not only in my case. It must be solved by administration by simple improving rules: rate a map possible only after finish game and submitting score! Who can make such decisions? 

[isj4]

Moral: Median rating is more useful than mean.

Sort of, but with only 11 discrete values possible information is lost. I find that there are noticeable differences between maps with avg rating 7.1 and 7.9.

Perhaps a simpler way to annoy the haters is to simply not post the average rating until at least 10 ratings have been made.

[yum-forum]

Moral: Median rating is more useful than mean.

Sort of, but with only 11 discrete values possible information is lost. I find that there are noticeable differences between maps with avg rating 7.1 and 7.9.

Perhaps a simpler way to annoy the haters is to simply not post the average rating until at least 10 ratings have been made.

Haters rate maps not only at the beginning. For example yesterday they within few minutes rated "1" all my maps  with rating high than 8.5. And also some other maps (#3557 of builder17 etc.)! And without playing and submitting score! Very easy in any time!

[Builder17]

Could Karsten75 or somebody else move this talk into other thread maybe?  ???

And submitting score in end is optional in CW3.  8)

Spoiler

So... Is mean rating system mean?  ;D

[close]