Missing CRPL commands

[Grauniad]

Nice to see the update of ref wiki.
And I found some interesting things in the syntax highlighting, which is not in any part of wiki :D :
CONST_GETATTRIBUTE
CONST_SETATTRIBUTE

http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=crpl:docs:getunitattribute
http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=crpl:docs:setunitattribute

http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=crpl:docs:getunitattribute#unit_constants

Also, wiki. It's a community thing.

[kai]

http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=crpl:docs:getunitattribute
http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=crpl:docs:setunitattribute

http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=crpl:docs:getunitattribute#unit_constants

Also, wiki. It's a community thing.

I didn't see any const called "CONST_GETATTRIBUTE"...
Also, I understand the meaning of wiki, but just bruteforce the function is a kind of time wasting right? ;)
Other than that, everything is fine.

[Grauniad]

I'm not responsible for what eduran puts in his syntax rules. :)

I think that was a form of shorthand for getting and setting of the various attribute constants. It has no place in the syntax per se.

[Grayzzur]

I  see on the CRPL Reference page, under Vars and Functions, there's a missing entry "Delete" - but that does not seem to be a valid CRPL command. Is that a placeholder for the "--" variable operator instead?

[Grauniad]

I  see on the CRPL Reference page, under Vars and Functions, there's a missing entry "Delete" - but that does not seem to be a valid CRPL command. Is that a placeholder for the "--" variable operator instead?

Yes. Here is the full list.

CRPL syntax mapping to internal  keywords.
:     FUNC
@   CALL
->!  REFWRITE
<-!  REFREAD
-?!  REFEXISTS
->  WRITE
<-  READ
-?  EXISTS
--  DELETE
(   OPENTRAN
)   CLOSETRAN

[Grayzzur]

Everything in the missing list as of today is now on the CRPL Reference page. I also replaced a few existing pages that didn't have the right namespace, causing them to seem to be missing (i.e. "crpl:GetCreeperColors" instead of "crpl:docs:GetCreeperColors").

With the exception of the warp operators. Do we want to add those, or is that concept sufficiently explained in the Overview?

[knucracker]

I think the warp operators can be left out.  It's syntax only and gets stripped out during compilations.  It's true there are OPENTRAN and CLOSETRAN internal keywords, but they get removed at the final step of compilation and result in the reordering the resulting opcodes that execute.