Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?

[lich98]

As stated in the title do you think that CW3 will === awesomeness? If not please post what you think it equals and why! Thanks!

[thepenguin]

of course.

the reason: why not?

[Cavemaniac]

It's a long time since I left school, and you kids with your 'new maths' should feel free to correct me, but I think it's obvious that:

CW3 >= AWESOMENESS

[lich98]

It's a long time since I left school, and you kids with your 'new maths' should feel free to correct me, but I think it's obvious that:

CW3 >= AWESOMENESS

no no CW3 >= EPICNESS

See much better.

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P

[Cavemaniac]

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P

Javascript?!

I just about mastered Basic - and that was nearly 30 years ago!

[lich98]

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P

Javascript?!

I just about mastered Basic - and that was nearly 30 years ago!

...

[thepenguin]

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P

as a matter of fact, yes.
@caveman,  === means strict equals

[Cavemaniac]

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P

as a matter of fact, yes.
@caveman,  === means strict equals

Showing my age here, the kids these days use all sorts of crazy talk.

For example, it turns out that 'sick' means 'good'.

It was much easier when I was young - when 'bad' meant good...

:)

Thanks for the clarification Penguin!

[lich98]

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P

as a matter of fact, yes.
@caveman,  === means strict equals

Showing my age here, the kids these days use all sorts of crazy talk.

For example, it turns out that 'sick' means 'good'.

It was much easier when I was young - when 'bad' meant good...

:)

Thanks for the clarification Penguin!

I don't believe in all that slang!

[TrickyDragon]

cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
~T0T4L 3P1CN355~

[TonyP2000]

Showing my age here, the kids these days use all sorts of crazy talk.
It was much easier when I was young - when 'bad' meant good...

Sorry, I couldn't resist...

[hoodwink]

cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
~T0T4L 3P1CN355~

Interesting equation you have there.
I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".

[thepenguin]

Interesting equation you have there.
I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".

true, but neither hold up under mathematical analysis:
cw3 > cw + cw2
3* cw > cw*(1+2) = cw*(3)
therefore 3>3, which does not work

cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
3*cw = cw^10*4*cw^2 + mc^2 = 4*cw^12 + mc^2
therefore, cw must be negative, which is not correct.

[hoodwink]

Interesting equation you have there.
I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".

true, but neither hold up under mathematical analysis:
cw3 > cw + cw2
3* cw > cw*(1+2) = cw*(3)
therefore 3>3, which does not work

I was literally saying that creeper world 3 will be better than creeper world 1 and 2 combined... :(

[4xC]

What hoodwink is saying about the third one smoking the first 2 is something I will always concur with.

Like I say in the blog comments, each game is EASILY the better of them all. ;D ;D ;D