Interesting equation you have there.

I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".

true, but neither hold up under mathematical analysis:

cw3 > cw + cw2

3* cw > cw*(1+2) = cw*(3)

therefore 3>3, which does not work

cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2

3*cw = cw^10*4*cw^2 + mc^2 = 4*cw^12 + mc^2

therefore, cw must be negative, which is not correct.