Weekly 5-Map Tournament - Supporting Wolfe Characters - closing Apr 7, 2013

[ctuna]

Some of the additional players - there were lots of options, but these are some of my favorites.

A few useful links:
All Tournaments (wiki) http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=cw2:weekly_5_map_tournament
Code Map Scoreboard http://knucklecracker.com/creeperworld2/viewscores.php
Tournament Score Tool http://knucklecracker.com/forums/index.php?topic=7477.0

Supporting Wolfe Characters

Please take care to copy/paste the map names from here. There are extra spaces between some of the first and last names.



   
   
   
   
   
   

Map Name:	Size:	Complexity:
Lilly    Rowan	Medium	Medium
Orrie Cather	Medium	High
Marko Vucik	Small	Medium
Dol Bonner	Small	High
Sergeant Stebbins	Large	Medium

[Cinth]

Looking at these and all I think is yuck.  Super drones to dodging drones.... no thanks, GL all.

[Helper]

Looking at these and all I think is yuck.  Super drones to dodging drones.... no thanks, GL all.

@Cinth - I just did a quick start up of all 5 games and can't figure out your comments. Are you sure you have the exact game names and difficulty levels?

"Lilly" starts out a bit quick, but all you have to do is move your LS down to the left, dig up a gem and build a couple of Blasters. While you're waiting for the gem, just put up a couple of Shields to stop the initial Drone attacks.

EDIT:

ctuna - these games look great to me. Not too difficult and not too easy. I'll try to find time to do a quick run through later.
H

[Cinth]

I looked at them all.. I saw 5 maps with drones, 2 with high health drones and one where you have to play dances with drones at the start.  It wasn't hard to see that I wasn't going to be even close to posting decent times, so I said yuck and GL all.


Nothing against anyone or the selection... just my opinion of those boards vs. my level of play.

[ctuna]

Well, I managed to get through all of them, though not with great scores. Here are the results so far:

Results Per Player


   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Rank	Name	Lilly    Rowan	Orrie Cather	Marko Vucik	Dol Bonner	Sergeant Stebbins	Total Score	Total Time
1	Helper	11918	11352	12318	11716	11344	58648	27:47
2	Atomicfrog	11465	11242	12184	11591	11260	57742	34:35
3	asmussen	11501	11079	12149	11653	10928	57310	38:04
4	ctuna	11228	11120	12137	11465	10747	56697	42:19
5	inept_celt	10083	10007	11675	11340	10079	53184	73:23
6	dhc	9588	9713	11263	10632	9427	50623	99:50
7	dt42	11704	11244	12262	11660		46870
8	Tiuipuv	11774	11210	12254	11623		46861
9	Lilly Rowan	10410	10338				20748
10	MizInIA	9760	8826				18586

Scores recorded at 2013-04-03 17:33:46 forum time.

I'm happy to see Lilly Rowan has joined in the hunt for some of her contemporaries, including herself. Does that seem weird, or is it just me?

[Cinth]

I'm happy to see Lilly Rowan has joined in the hunt for some of her contemporaries, including herself. Does that seem weird, or is it just me?

Archie Goodwin and Fritz Brenner posted times last week.

[asmussen]

I'm happy to see Lilly Rowan has joined in the hunt for some of her contemporaries, including herself. Does that seem weird, or is it just me?

Archie Goodwin and Fritz Brenner posted times last week.

I noticed that also. I was trying to figure out if somebody was just having some fun with the scoreboard, or if some new player didn't understand that he was supposed to put the name he wished to appear as when prompted.

[ctuna]

I'm happy to see Lilly Rowan has joined in the hunt for some of her contemporaries, including herself. Does that seem weird, or is it just me?

Archie Goodwin and Fritz Brenner posted times last week.

Yeah - clearly I missed that - too far down the chart, I guess - shows where my focus is, huh?

[ctuna]

Results Per Player


   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Rank	Name	Lilly    Rowan	Orrie Cather	Marko Vucik	Dol Bonner	Sergeant Stebbins	Total Score	Total Time
1	Helper	11918	11352	12318	11716	11344	58648	27:47
2	Tiuipuv	11774	11210	12254	11623	11198	58059	32:08
3	dt42	11704	11244	12262	11660	11172	58042	32:20
4	Atomicfrog	11465	11242	12184	11591	11260	57742	34:35
5	ctuna	11797	11120	12270	11695	10747	57629	35:51
6	asmussen	11501	11079	12149	11653	10928	57310	38:04
7	Gu250	10909	10597	11491	11237	10455	54689	59:23
8	inept_celt	10083	10007	11941	11340	10232	53603	70:33
9	dhc	9588	9713	11263	10632	9427	50623	99:50
10	MizInIA	9760	8826	11275	11262	9306	50429	92:04
11	Cinth		9828	11377	10056	9745	41006
12	Orrie Cather		11036	11454			22490
13	Lilly Rowan	10410	10338				20748
14	Marko Vucik			11728			11728
15	Dol Bonner				11585		11585
16	Sergeant Stebbi					10841	10841

Scores recorded at 2013-04-05 07:52:55 forum time.

[Tiuipuv]

Do scores normally get within 20? It seems really close.

[Helper]

Scores are often as close as 2-3 points.
Which two are you talking about?

[Tiuipuv]

I was referring to dt42's score and mine. With over 58000 points, I am winning by 17 (for now). That's .03%. It's amazing scores can get as close as 2-3  :o

[Helper]

I was referring to dt42's score and mine. With over 58000 points, I am winning by 17 (for now). That's .03%. It's amazing scores can get as close as 2-3  :o

Watch out for the Deetster - he's a bulldog when he gets close to another player's score.

[Kithros]

I was referring to dt42's score and mine. With over 58000 points, I am winning by 17 (for now). That's .03%. It's amazing scores can get as close as 2-3  :o

I suspect it's in large part because people keep playing until they get a better score than their 'opponent', and by the time they get a score even a tiny bit better than the other they stop bothering trying to make their score better. There's still plenty of room for improvement on these scores (or at least there always have been whenever I played through the maps).

Also, the time spent measurement is probably more accurate than the score measurement (in terms of percentages at least), because most maps are finished very quickly and as such even if you took twice as long on a map, the score wouldn't actually be *that* much different (relatively speaking).

[Helper]

...the score wouldn't actually be *that* much different (relatively speaking).

Except when Kithros plays - then his will be about half the time of mere mortals.
LOL!