Knuckle Cracker

Particle Fleet => Ships => Topic started by: AutoPost on May 05, 2017, 04:11:23 PM

Title: Ship #1182: QASPA #21. Designer: Tardis73
Post by: AutoPost on May 05, 2017, 04:11:23 PM
This topic is for discussion of ship #1182: QASPA #21
(http://knucklecracker.com/particlefleet/queryShips.php?query=thumbnailid&id=1182)

Size: 22x15
Designer: Tardis73

Corporation:
(http://knucklecracker.com/particlefleet/queryCN.php?logo=7311fbb5de7a3e6746d8514b78745071)QASPA
CEO: Qwerty Quazo

Desc:
My choice of a fighter base module. Maybe replace some engines with raectors or tanks?
Title: Re: Ship #1182: QASPA #21. Designer: Tardis73
Post by: Keeper Decagon on May 05, 2017, 04:42:14 PM
To be honest, considering the relatively high energy drain of the Fighter module, you'd be better off swapping at least one, or both, of the reactors in favour of energy tanks/guppies. The reactors would be nowhere near sufficient enough to allow the ship to sustain its Fighters in a prolonged fight away from an energy mine.

I like the design though.
Title: Re: Ship #1182: QASPA #21. Designer: Tardis73
Post by: GoodMorning on May 05, 2017, 06:42:40 PM
Guppies, perhaps. I'm not are about this one. It's clearly not a frontline vessel, but - that many engines on such a ship?
Title: Re: Ship #1182: QASPA #21. Designer: Tardis73
Post by: Qwerty Quazo on May 06, 2017, 01:54:40 AM
Quote from: GoodMorning on May 05, 2017, 06:42:40 PM
that many engines on such a ship?

That's for style.  :D

Quote from: Keeper Decagon on May 05, 2017, 04:42:14 PM
you'd be better off swapping at least one, or both, of the reactors in favour of energy tanks/guppies.

Ok! I'll see what I come up with.

Thanks for the feedback, guys!