This week's theme is the 5 NFL teams with the best records last year. I added some spaces for interesting maps. It was tough to find high-creeper maps for some reason (which I prefer), but these should do.
NOTE: I changed the 2nd map from 'medium/high' to 'large/high' so we wouldn't have 2 maps with the same combination of size and complexity.
A few useful links:All Tournaments (wiki) (http://knucklecracker.com/wiki/doku.php?id=cw2:weekly_5_map_tournament)
Code Map Scoreboard (http://knucklecracker.com/creeperworld2/viewscores.php)
Tournament Score Tool (http://knucklecracker.com/forums/index.php?topic=7477.0)
Theme:NFL teams
Map Name: | Size: | Complexity: |
Denver Broncos: 13-3 | Medium | High |
Atlanta Falcons, 13-3 | Large | High |
New England Patriots, 12-4 | Small | Low |
Houston Texans 12-4 | Large | Medium |
San Francisco 49ers:11-4-1 | Small | Medium |
Results Per Player
Rank | Name | Denver Broncos: 13-3 | Atlanta Falcons, 13-3 | New England Patriots, 12-4 | Houston Texans 12-4 | San Francisco 49ers:11-4-1 | Total Score | Total Time |
1 | Eketek | 10703 | 12092 | 11844 | 11954 | 12272 | 58865 | 38:03 |
2 | dt42 | 10629 | 12047 | 11677 | 11781 | 12173 | 58307 | 42:17 |
3 | asmussen | 10394 | 11996 | 11693 | 11951 | 12248 | 58282 | 42:53 |
4 | Zaggy | 10251 | 11849 | 11727 | 11340 | 12309 | 57476 | 50:07 |
5 | cleatoma | 9681 | 11556 | 11804 | 11116 | 12147 | 56304 | 61:35 |
6 | Benabik | 9309 | 11249 | 10708 | 10322 | 11472 | 53060 | 88:35 |
7 | Wheatmidge | 11127 | 12390 | 11801 | 12149 | | 47467 | |
8 | Marley | | 10624 | 11335 | 10888 | 11624 | 44471 | |
9 | inept_celt | | 9677 | 11218 | 9653 | 11824 | 42372 | |
10 | Ekira84 | | 8780 | 10428 | 8897 | 10034 | 38139 | |
11 | ea3401 | 11325 | | 11932 | | 12499 | 35756 | |
12 | MizInIA | | 10158 | 11071 | | 11679 | 32908 | |
13 | Martin | | | 11477 | | 12095 | 23572 | |
14 | Atomicfrog | | | 11813 | 11363 | | 23176 | |
15 | JF-T | | | 11091 | | 11566 | 22657 | |
16 | ctuna | | 11253 | | | | 11253 | |
Scores recorded at 2013-09-15 23:05:07 forum time.
the rules say we shouldn't have 2 maps with the same size complexity settings. are we playing them anyway or should one of them get changed?
Quote from: MizInIA on September 09, 2013, 01:57:48 PM
the rules say we shouldn't have 2 maps with the same size complexity settings. are we playing them anyway or should one of them get changed?
I guess it got fixed.
Quote from: Grauniad on September 09, 2013, 02:17:30 PM
Quote from: MizInIA on September 09, 2013, 01:57:48 PM
the rules say we shouldn't have 2 maps with the same size complexity settings. are we playing them anyway or should one of them get changed?
I guess it got fixed.
Yep, ninja-fixed. I updated the size of the 2nd map. Sorry about that; if I make maps again, I'll be sure they're OK before I make the first official forum post.
Quote from: Zaggy on September 09, 2013, 02:21:18 PM
Yep, ninja-fixed. I updated the size of the 2nd map. Sorry about that; if I make maps again, I'll be sure they're OK before I make the first official forum post.
it doesn't matter to me really I just wanted to make sure that if it was going to change it occurred now instead of half way through the week. :)
Ugh, I'm really regretting that 1st map. It's hard to get a good foundation, and the 10 phantoms aren't making it easy.
Yes, it's a tough one.
It really is. But the cool thing is it's possible, since 2 people have scored on it. Personally, it's the third map i hate mostly. Deal with a 581K emitter immediately? Cool.
I really enjoyed Atlanta Falcons, 13-3
Grabbing the gems and taking advantage of the fields you can nullify both the surface gateway and the emitter in less than 30 seconds :)
Quote from: Wheatmidge on September 10, 2013, 12:50:08 AM
I really enjoyed Atlanta Falcons, 13-3
Grabbing the gems and taking advantage of the fields you can nullify both the surface gateway and the emitter in less than 30 seconds :)
Impressive. I lost three nullifiers that way.
This week's winner is Eketek! Congratulations. Hope everybody had fun with these maps!