Knuckle Cracker Knuckle Cracking Goodness!
knucklecracker.com
Try some  CW1 CUSTOM MAPS!  and some  CW2 CUSTOM MAPS!
May 24, 2013, 01:49:47 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register Chat(5)  
Knuckle Cracker > Creeper World > Custom Map Discussion > Unapproved Map Discussion
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Unapproved Map Discussion  (Read 10343 times)
SPIFFEN
beta
*****
Posts: 1631


NORWAY
« Reply #180 on: July 29, 2010, 08:42:49 pm »
Oh i forgot to add an s to my latest uploaded map ,
it's uploaded as SPIFFEN Zipper , but it should have been SPIFFENs Zipper .
Can you change it for me , or deny it so i can change it myself plz .
( Not important if it gets accepted without that s =P )

Edit :
THX =)
« Last Edit: July 29, 2010, 09:04:09 pm by SPIFFEN » Logged
PLZ THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU CALL YOUR TOPIC ! It will make the search work better =)
My maps : http://knucklecracker.com/creeperworld/viewmaps.php?author=SPIFFEN
How to make links
Karsten75
beta
*****
Posts: 3054
« Reply #181 on: July 31, 2010, 10:58:14 pm »
I just rejected a map that generated slightly more than 88 energy/second. All from a single pile of stacked reactors. Just for the heck of it, I calculated how many reactors that would be - about 290 reactors.

Guess how much that map lagged.  The author added a remark "not good with slow computers."
Logged
Oh my face, I can't get it out of my palm.
Fisherck
beta
*****
Posts: 2013


There is always a bigger fish...
« Reply #182 on: July 31, 2010, 11:30:45 pm »
Quote from: Karsten75 on July 31, 2010, 10:58:14 pm
I just rejected a map that generated slightly more than 88 energy/second. All from a single pile of stacked reactors. Just for the heck of it, I calculated how many reactors that would be - about 290 reactors.

Guess how much that map lagged.  The author added a remark "not good with slow computers."

Why? I could not push the space bar 289 times. The author must have a really good computer or must think that most people do.
Logged
My CW2 Maps
My CW1 Maps
Quote from: Sqaz on August 28, 2011, 01:49:35 pm
The comments are here to comment, dare to use them.
thepenguin
beta
*****
Posts: 2659


"What if ..."


WWW
« Reply #183 on: August 10, 2010, 07:45:38 am »
Quote from: Karsten75 on July 31, 2010, 10:58:14 pm
I just rejected a map that generated slightly more than 88 energy/second. All from a single pile of stacked reactors. Just for the heck of it, I calculated how many reactors that would be - about 290 reactors.

Guess how much that map lagged.  The author added a remark "not good with slow computers."

probably not too much
(I have a very fast computer)
Logged
We have become the creeper.
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]   Go Up
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!