Author Topic: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names  (Read 29982 times)

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #60 on: November 10, 2015, 01:19:11 am »
Suspicious score:

S200_19 : Igotoftstead
Mystion        0:49.7
« Last Edit: November 21, 2015, 10:32:10 am by iamltr27 »

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #61 on: November 17, 2015, 09:04:28 pm »
Suspicious scores:

S100_28 : Astcor
savagenights       0:33.6

S100_28 : Faracotan
savagenights       0:40.5

S100_28 : Kyleucorol
savagenights       0:49.7

S100_28 : Empmira
savagenights       1:08.0

S100_28 : Tulphe
savagenights       1:20.6

S100_28 : Lumneckum
savagenights       1:46.6

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #62 on: December 05, 2015, 08:52:06 pm »
Suspicious scores:

S100_199 : Oralipho
savagenights       1:09.0


I would assume that the following first place scores are also cheats based on the player's history.

S100_199 : Polcorpis
savagenights       7:14.6

S100_199 : Sunap
savagenights       5:01.5


For added amusement, Tex and wiseage (a couple of players who regularly show up at the top of boards with what appear to be legit scores) both bested savagenights at S100_199 Dunvasseian.  Working on the assumption that savagenights was hacking for all his scores in this system, it looks like he wasn't competent enough to consistently beat good players even with his hacks active.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2015, 09:12:03 pm by iamltr27 »

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #63 on: December 06, 2015, 03:12:48 pm »
Suspicious score:

S200_40 : Auchnaier
Merlin       0:57.4

Karsten75

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6389
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #64 on: March 27, 2016, 03:38:12 pm »
Suspect with six-sigma certainty that Yulice didn't get this score legitimately.

"Any leftover cabbage can and will be mixed with mayo"
   - Cole's Law

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #65 on: April 02, 2016, 12:24:43 am »
Suspicious score:

S200_64 : Bradsometum
bricou       0:48.6

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #66 on: April 06, 2016, 08:14:07 pm »
Suspicious score:

S200_168 : Sudcardentum
DonRobusto        0:00.0


This is the first time I have noted an insta-win.

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #67 on: April 15, 2016, 07:21:24 pm »
Suspicious scores:

S200_150 : Golkaola
steffan       0:48.8
landwhale   0:54.5

S200_198 : Culvasse
landwhale   0:32.8

S200_167 : Stanpir
landwhale   0:46.2

S200_196 : Caerpirmouth
landwhale   0:28.3

S200_81 : Lummicanxen
landwhale   1:58.9

iamltr27

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #68 on: April 23, 2016, 11:03:27 pm »
Suspicious scores:

S200_82 : Dalzens
Bio       0:27.7

S200_124 : Lostwayter
Bio      0:32.7

chwooly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 333
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #69 on: July 31, 2016, 09:46:42 am »
On Colonial Space map 3622 (Particles #7 by Tardis) at score position #8 The user name is [inappropriate to repeat on the forum].
« Last Edit: July 31, 2016, 11:24:25 am by Karsten75 »

Prof

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #70 on: October 10, 2016, 07:07:01 pm »
The tier-0 building speed is one packet per sixteen frames, or 1.875 E/s.  The charging speed is one packet per nine frames, or 3.333 E/s.  A Nullifier takes 50 energy to build, 50 energy to charge, and 2 seconds to fully discharge.  A Command Node takes 3 seconds to land.  Conclusion: the minimum possible time for Inceptus: Tempus is 3 + (50 / 1.875) + (50 / 3.333) + 2 seconds, or 46.667s total.

There are four times on Inceptus: Tempus which are below this minimum possible time.  I don't know if they were possible at some point in the past, but they're very definitely not possible now.

Currently there are 18, the lowest being 7 seconds.

Cynikal

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #71 on: November 27, 2016, 06:03:31 pm »
Username: M-53
What map? Every single one i've played so far.

Always on top of the list, with insanely low times. (1 sec, 7 sec, etc)

StormD

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #72 on: December 28, 2016, 02:48:21 pm »
Are sub-45s times possible on any map? Even the first one, I can't figure out how to get a Nullifier built and charged in less than a minute.

Curtis hurst

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #73 on: May 08, 2017, 08:15:13 am »
I just want to say I think this game is Awsome and even more Awsome that you guys r trying to sort the cheaters from the players, I think I may have somthing the game seems to miss or the players miss atleast, I hope my guppy adventures will open up some fresh ideas , how ever some of the maps I've already posted have taken me best part of 3 days to make it hurts a little to see a stupid scores of just a few mins to complete after all that time planning, I stopped playing a famous game that's been going for several years on the PlayStation come other devices, cost me best part of 100 pound to go online to be cheated out of my points. Awsome job guys keep up good work I know you guys find it hard to cope with all the text traffic and your game making too please everyone just wanted to spur you guys on and let you know you are appreciated:-)

fanstar1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Re: Suspicious Scores and Inappropriate Names
« Reply #74 on: June 16, 2017, 10:21:42 pm »
suspect score(s):Suspect scores screenshot
« Last Edit: June 16, 2017, 10:23:45 pm by fanstar1 »