Unapproved Map Discussion

knucracker · 43939

SPIFFEN

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 1631
  • NORWAY
Reply #180 on: July 29, 2010, 09:42:49 pm
Oh i forgot to add an s to my latest uploaded map ,
it's uploaded as SPIFFEN Zipper , but it should have been SPIFFENs Zipper .
Can you change it for me , or deny it so i can change it myself plz .
( Not important if it gets accepted without that s =P )

Edit :
THX =)
« Last Edit: July 29, 2010, 10:04:09 pm by SPIFFEN »

PLZ THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU CALL YOUR TOPIC ! It will make the search work better =)
My maps : http://knucklecracker.com/creeperworld/viewmaps.php?author=SPIFFEN
How to make links


Karsten75

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 6898
Reply #181 on: July 31, 2010, 11:58:14 pm
I just rejected a map that generated slightly more than 88 energy/second. All from a single pile of stacked reactors. Just for the heck of it, I calculated how many reactors that would be - about 290 reactors.

Guess how much that map lagged.  The author added a remark "not good with slow computers."

'If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.'

Albert Einstein
(1879-1955)


Fisherck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2072
  • There is always a bigger fish...
Reply #182 on: August 01, 2010, 12:30:45 am
I just rejected a map that generated slightly more than 88 energy/second. All from a single pile of stacked reactors. Just for the heck of it, I calculated how many reactors that would be - about 290 reactors.

Guess how much that map lagged.  The author added a remark "not good with slow computers."

Why? I could not push the space bar 289 times. The author must have a really good computer or must think that most people do.

My CW2 Maps
My CW1 Maps
The comments are here to comment, dare to use them.


thepenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 3038
  • "What if ..."
Reply #183 on: August 10, 2010, 08:45:38 am
I just rejected a map that generated slightly more than 88 energy/second. All from a single pile of stacked reactors. Just for the heck of it, I calculated how many reactors that would be - about 290 reactors.

Guess how much that map lagged.  The author added a remark "not good with slow computers."

probably not too much
(I have a very fast computer)

We have become the creeper...