Knuckle Cracker

Misc. => Builder's Corner => Topic started by: Grauniad on November 08, 2013, 11:03:28 am

Title: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 08, 2013, 11:03:28 am
I thought I'd post a topic for benchmarks. That way Virgil has a place to post the performance of his current and new machine and to compare it with other contributors to this thread.

For this benchmark I use/recommend the Passmark Performance tool (http://www.passmark.com/download/pt_download.htm) that has a free 30-day grace period.

The how-to:

Download the performance tool and install it.
Run the performance tool and then submit your baseline result to the PassMark site. Follow the link on your screen!
From there you can get the necessary BBCode to copy and past in your post here.

Benchmarks contributed:

miquelfire (https://knucklecracker.com/forums/index.php?topic=14629.msg176356#msg176356)

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/111875960106.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=111875960106)

Shadowdragon7015 (https://knucklecracker.com/forums/index.php?topic=14629.msg176422#msg176422)

 (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/112043842163.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=112043842163)

Karsten75 partial rebuild 06/15/2018

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/103763538692.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=103763538692)

:B 

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/111454730664.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=111454730664)

Bardel

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/55854036702.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=55854036702)

VirgilW (new build on 11/21/2013)

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15893116190.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15893116190)

MadMag:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15365963031.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15365963031)

Helper:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15500958235.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15500958235)

J (new laptop 6/7/2015)

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/42253013236.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=42253013236)

Allu (SSD enabled):

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17536554286.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17536554286)

Grauniad (SSD enabled)

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15502004615.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15502004615)

Grayzzur:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15526761115.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15526761115)

Grauniad (HDD instead of SSD test):

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15363407333.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15363407333)

Allu:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17509344503.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17509344503)

Karsten75:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17511864567.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17511864567)

Wheatmidge

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17827716303.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17827716303)

miquelfire (home):

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15491519238.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15491519238)

Virgilw (Old development machine - retired 11/21/2013).

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15368438773.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15368438773)

miquelfire (work):

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15375323653.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15375323653)

Echo51:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15525417412.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15525417412)

CobraKill (New laptop):

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/16026442311.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=16026442311)

Wally:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/16186249203.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=16186249203)

Blaze:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15385604194.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15385604194)


Michionlion:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15412523368.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15412523368)

Mr. H.

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/20818115971.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=20818115971)

J:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/16187304215.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=16187304215)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: MadMag on November 08, 2013, 12:02:41 pm
Here is my soon to be replaced Monster :)

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15365963031.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15365963031)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 08, 2013, 12:06:14 pm
Pretty nice. :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: CobraKill on November 08, 2013, 12:31:05 pm
Here is my soon to be replaced Monster :)

Can I have it once you replace it? :P
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: knucracker on November 08, 2013, 01:14:31 pm
Here is my current system... the one I developed CW2 and CW3 on:
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15368438773.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15368438773)

Here is the background music to go with the results:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DnqW3F57E
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: MadMag on November 08, 2013, 01:43:50 pm
Amazing what you can do with a dinosaur :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 08, 2013, 03:08:15 pm
Here is my current system... the one I developed CW2 and CW3 on:


Interesting, if you follow the link and click through on your old graphics card, the Passmark numbers that come up afterward rate the GTX 770 nearly identical in value for money as your current card, but at about 3x the performance. The only card that shows better value is the GTX 760 that you didn't want. :P
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: knucracker on November 08, 2013, 03:19:12 pm
The 770 gave me an extra $50 off the nvidia shield ($100 off rather than $50 off with the 760).  That probably swings the overall value back to around the same as the 760.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 08, 2013, 03:20:49 pm
You can justify the Shield as much as you want...
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 08, 2013, 03:22:25 pm
A thought just came to mind. We should divide the price by the passmark rating to arrive at a value-for-money measurement.  :) TO further enhance that, we can then multiply the VFM measurement by the number of months that system has been in use. It will totally discrimiminte against those who build awesome machines and then replace them within a year. :P
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on November 08, 2013, 04:55:23 pm
My machine at work. I love the disk set up on it, that's the only reason I'm posting it.

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15375323653.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15375323653)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Blaze on November 08, 2013, 09:22:49 pm
I probably lost points on the CD/DVD test seeing how I still don't have my drive hooked up. ::)
The Graphics tests were amusing to watch. Giant jellyfish in space... :D

Also it says my CPU was measured to be 2.60 GHz, yet I used the built in overclock (since my BIOS is locked) and it said it's up to 4.0 GHz and I have it set to clock up that high as needed...
I have it set to clock down to 2.0 GHz, or 50% when not needed, might retake and have it locked at 4.0 GHz and see if it says different.
Nevermind, looked at the CPU details and it shows the multiplier correctly.

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15385604194.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15385604194)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Michionlion on November 09, 2013, 10:40:15 am
And here's mine...  I'll be build a desktop later this year (this is a laptop), probably following some of your guys' directions and information.  I don't think this is too bad for a laptop.

BTW, blaze, your PC should be much better than that, you probably have something that is bogging everything down...

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15412523368.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15412523368)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 09, 2013, 11:28:45 am
It's that Intel HD 3000 graphics that's the real hit on your performance - and whatever it is you have in there for a hard drive. For some reason the hard drive is not listed on the benchmark statistics.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Michionlion on November 09, 2013, 12:45:42 pm
It's that Intel HD 3000 graphics that's the real hit on your performance - and whatever it is you have in there for a hard drive. For some reason the hard drive is not listed on the benchmark statistics.

Indeed.  My laptop model has an optional radeon card, but I didn't know enough when I bought it to chose that...  You don't know how many times I've berated myself over that.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 09, 2013, 12:49:03 pm
can you still buy it and put it in? Many laptops still has the slot and everything. Just a matter of a few screws...
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Michionlion on November 09, 2013, 01:05:47 pm
can you still buy it and put it in? Many laptops still has the slot and everything. Just a matter of a few screws...


I looked into that a while ago, but never really determined anything...  but since I am getting a new PC soon anyway, I probably won't through down more just for a couple weeks of Radeonness.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Blaze on November 09, 2013, 02:58:57 pm
BTW, blaze, your PC should be much better than that, you probably have something that is bogging everything down...

Whatever it is it's only for the benchmark, I run most of my games really well.
Currently running over half of my games at beyond max settings with at least 40+ fps with the rest on medium and similar frame rates.

I have some exceptions, such as Company of Heroes 2, even on low settings I get low frames, though it is playable.
Then again I used to play L4D2 at 5 fps when all I had was a tiny little laptop to play on. ::)

It's probably the CPU, I think it's only counting the base speed for the benchmark, and not the 4.0 GHz OC I have on it.
And even elsewhere my CPU seems to be the bottleneck now, as physics heavy stuff has an impact on my frame rates.
Such as Vindictus, on the boat there is a lot of physic props that can be destroyed, using a character with a large attack radius and destroying a lot of stuff makes my fps fall over and die for a second.
Then again that is one game I can really say is lacking in the optimization department, as removing the UI brings me from 45 fps to a solid 60 in most areas.
Not to mention somebody reduced the bitrate of the music by a tiny amount and seen an fps improvement...

Such a great game ruined by a bad company. :-\
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on November 10, 2013, 11:14:31 pm
Home Machine, my main game machine.

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15491519238.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15491519238)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 11, 2013, 02:30:02 am
Home Machine, my main game machine.

That's very interesting. You have the same CPU as Virgil, yet the rest of your configuration slightly edges him out.  Which makes me want to organize these benchmarks by rank... :)

I'm interested in your RAM configuration. Do you have 6MB per channe (4+2 GB) l or do you have an asymmetric 8/4 GB configuration? I thought the latter would drop your memory into single-channel performance.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Helper on November 11, 2013, 06:02:35 am
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15500958235.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15500958235)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 11, 2013, 06:10:24 am
Wow Helper, that's impressive.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Helper on November 11, 2013, 06:18:04 am
@G - thank you.
I haven't noticed any lag on any of the CW games.
:)
Total cost for components was about US$1350.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 11, 2013, 06:44:54 am
@G - thank you.
I haven't noticed any lag on any of the CW games.
:)
Total cost for components was about US$1350.

About that. I was checking back on your thread and you did not list a OS in the build cost. Were (are) you still on the preferential Microsoft subscription plan?
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on November 11, 2013, 09:29:04 am
I have 4/2/4/2 (I assume that's what you meant by the 4+2), the 4GB chips are like the ones shown on the benchmark.

Basically, I built it with 4 GB, then later on when I had too many VMs to run with that amount, I tossed in the 8. Normally how I build my systems.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 11, 2013, 11:27:40 am
I have 4/2/4/2 (I assume that's what you meant by the 4+2), the 4GB chips are like the ones shown on the benchmark.

Basically, I built it with 4 GB, then later on when I had too many VMs to run with that amount, I tossed in the 8. Normally how I build my systems.
Ah thanks! I've come across big-name builds that have the memory allocated unevenly over the channels and thus it runs in single-channel mode as opposed to dual-channel.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 11, 2013, 12:36:55 pm
These results are incredibly intriguing.

For my own analysis I made this little spreadsheet comparing current results:

(http://knucklecracker.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=14629.0;attach=16150;image) (http://knucklecracker.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=14629.0;attach=16150;image)

My main observation would be that Michionlion would get a LOT of extra mileage out of that laptop (look at the CPU measurements) if he could put a better graphics card in it as well as maybe a SSD.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Helper on November 11, 2013, 04:43:27 pm
About that. I was checking back on your thread and you did not list a OS in the build cost. Were (are) you still on the preferential Microsoft subscription plan?

Sorry for the delay - been out having a Second Amendment day.

I still have some left over licenses from before I shut down the business. A legitimate cost would include whatever flavor OS was chosen to run.

RAM and graphics card were always two of my solutions for perking up an older system, and since the common release, an SSD. For a workstation, the SSD can be a fairly inexpensive upgrade if you just get one big enough for the OS and use the old SATA drive for data/storage.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Echo51 on November 11, 2013, 05:09:19 pm
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15525417412.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15525417412)

CPU running 2.78ghz really, and the low-end motherboard probably chokes the entire thing real bad...
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grayzzur on November 11, 2013, 05:30:12 pm
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15526761115.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15526761115)

My gaming/whatever desktop. I like to go with the sweet spot on the price/performance curve when I buy. The point where you start to get serious diminishing returns for your extra dollars. This is why I have, say, an i5 instead of an i7. I also like quiet systems. I don't overclock my cpu or gpu. I put a big-ass heatsink and fan in there so it can keep it cool without the fan running crazy. I built this, and a near twin to it for my son, for Christmas 2012.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on November 11, 2013, 05:40:14 pm

My gaming/whatever desktop. I like to go with the sweet spot on the price/performance curve when I buy.

Great minds think alike! :) It's amazing how close your results are to mine. I'm going to study them for a while.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: CobraKill on November 11, 2013, 09:18:44 pm
Dell Latitude E6400

Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit

Passmark Rating:    621
CPU Mark: 2101   
2D Graphics Mark: 436.7   
3D Graphics Mark: 97
Memory Mark: 804   
Disk Mark: 450.9   

Hardware
CPU Type   Intel Core i2 Duo T9600 @2.8Ghz
Memory   4GB
Video Card Tested NViDIA Quadro NVS 160M
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My crappy laptop. It's five years old, and hopefully soon to be replaced. I missed the link to the benchmark page when I first submitted my baseline.


Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: knucracker on November 21, 2013, 10:14:23 am
At last, the results from my new build:
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/15893116190.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=15893116190)

Conclusions I can draw from this build:
- The samsung 840 evo drives are a really good intersection of performance, reliability, and price.

- The nvidia gtx 770 is a good card and with the recent price drops it falls into the sweet spot of price/performance.  $100 off the nvidia Shield made it extra nice.

- Windows 8.1 seems like a total disaster at first when coming from windows 7.  But learning to ignore the tile page and setting up the desktop 'properly' and it starts to feel much, much better.  Of note, the passmark results are just a tad worse under win 8.1 than win 7 (for most of the results).  But from my understanding win 7 passmark results can be a lot worse under win 7 than under win XP.  The drops between 7 and 8.1 are inconsequential, though.

- It is possible to receive a fan that is internally wired up backwards during manufacturing so that it spins backwards.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Helper on November 21, 2013, 11:30:35 am
Conclusions I can draw from your results:
"Barn-burner!"

Very nice system.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: CobraKill on November 22, 2013, 08:00:12 pm
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/16026442311.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=16026442311)

My new laptop...
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Wally on November 26, 2013, 08:12:42 am
That's my modest contribution to Earths global warming

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/16186249203.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=16186249203)

Average CPU, High 2D/Memory/Disk Mark but horrible 3D Mark.

Conclusion : CW3 is very well coded as it keeps running smoothly, even on big and complex maps, with outdated computers !
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: J on November 26, 2013, 08:56:07 am
My 3.5 year old laptop:
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/16187304215.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=16187304215)
This is what I use to play CW3, browse the web ect...
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: allu on December 24, 2013, 11:47:48 am
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17509344503.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17509344503)

I finally got it finished.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on December 24, 2013, 12:55:04 pm
I have an older Intel i5-2500K, still running well, but it takes a lot of time to boot up...

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17511864567.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17511864567)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: allu on December 25, 2013, 02:00:15 am
This time its done with SSD enabled. 
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17536554286.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17536554286)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on December 25, 2013, 08:56:45 am
It does make a difference! :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: allu on December 25, 2013, 10:03:50 am
:D It made my day.( When I compared it to others listed here) Tough my friend ran that on his computer on got 4800 something.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: MadMag on December 25, 2013, 11:03:19 am
Just think what a PCI-e SSD can do :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on December 25, 2013, 12:21:20 pm
:D It made my day.( When I compared it to others listed here) Tough my friend ran that on his computer on got 4800 something.


Ask your friend to post his results here. I'm always interested in high-performance rigs. :)

Just think what a PCI-e SSD can do :)

I see that's making a comeback now. :) Also I recently read somewhere that a crucial specification is being revides, which will improve PCI-e SSD performance by avoiding the overhead of translating the data stream to SATA.  Will be interesting in a year or so.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Wheatmidge on December 30, 2013, 06:42:07 pm
Thought I would get around to posting my laptop that I picked up in September.



(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/17827716303.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=17827716303)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Grauniad on December 30, 2013, 06:57:47 pm
Nice! Seems to be the fastest laptop we have to date. Even beats out the machine CW3 was developed on. :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Wheatmidge on January 03, 2014, 11:30:29 pm
Nice! Seems to be the fastest laptop we have to date. Even beats out the machine CW3 was developed on. :)

That is actually quite nice to hear. It was my second choice. Originally I tried to buy a refurbished gaming machine with a SSHD and other stuff, But after having it for 2 days the keyboard failed and the silly shop wanted to charge $300 for a new keyboard. So It was just returned and I bought this one from costco. To me it felt like a bit of a step down. But I am overall happy with it :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Mr.H on March 03, 2014, 03:56:07 am
Moore's law always get you in the end

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/20818115971.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=20818115971)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Miksu on April 13, 2014, 03:37:43 pm
Let me throw my results in:

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/22648401317.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=22648401317)

Note: SSD tested, not HDD

For some reason my graphics card don't like to perform on 2D and my RAM is a bit lazy apparently, but overall, a good rig. Not great, but good. :)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: inept_celt on May 14, 2014, 09:01:32 am
Built a new rig, spent about $1250.  Pretty quick.

(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/23867634885.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=23867634885)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: J on June 07, 2015, 11:15:26 am
My new laptop, spent 1200. With an integrated graphics card and a seperate GeForce card it picked the slower card for some tests, but overall still nice results (without overclocking).
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/42252106778.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=42252106778)

Edit: Skip the score above, redid the graphics tests with nvidia card only, much better 3D graphics score.
(http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/images/42253013236.png) (http://www.passmark.com/baselines/V8/display.php?id=42253013236)

Can the list be updated? It's not nice to sit at the bottom of the list ;D
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on June 07, 2015, 03:04:27 pm


Can the list be updated? It's not nice to sit at the bottom of the list ;D

Added your very impressive score (for a laptop) to the list. :)

If there are others in this thread who has not been added to the top post, please shout out - I've not been maintaining this.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: J on January 09, 2018, 11:49:13 am
With a broken laptop comes a new laptop, and with a new laptop comes a new score:
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/95540062954.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=95540062954)
Rerunning the 2D tests gives increases this score by another 100 points.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on January 10, 2018, 06:51:13 pm
New custom built tower, didnt know this forum thread existed...
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/95630218238.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=95630218238)
First computer i've ever built :D
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on January 10, 2018, 07:53:42 pm
New custom built tower, didnt know this forum thread existed...
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/95630218238.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=95630218238)
First computer i've ever built :D

Oh man, nice rig, but in a rig that beefy, why a 1050 Ti?? That rig is worth a 1070 at least?
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on January 10, 2018, 09:18:06 pm
No money for a 1070 :P
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on January 10, 2018, 11:30:45 pm
No money for a 1070 :P

You'll get a few extra years out of that monster if you later upgrade the video card. It's a nice box, and more powerful than Virgil's development machine.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on January 10, 2018, 11:47:38 pm
Planning to upgrade the ram and videocard hopefully sometime next month.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: cornucanis on January 25, 2018, 03:25:42 pm
I've been going on a lot about how absolutely terrible the system I use to run this game is, so I thought I'd post the evidence here. Please prepare your incredulity.

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/sigImage.php?id=96571757274)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Lost in Nowhere on January 26, 2018, 01:14:22 am
I might as well do this as well...
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/96594927384.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=96594927384)
Not too awful for a six-year-old laptop...
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on January 26, 2018, 02:30:03 pm
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/96632607794.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=96632607794)
2 year old laptop
really struggled on the disk portion
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: cornucanis on January 27, 2018, 05:27:45 pm
2 year old laptop
really struggled on the disk portion
 

Did something happen to your desktop or are you just showcasing your archaeological discovery like we were?  :P
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: FOXX on January 28, 2018, 12:57:12 pm
My current Laptop i make PF Maps with.

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/96749428936.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=96749428936)

Will hopefully be replaced with a I7 this year.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on January 28, 2018, 02:17:17 pm
2 year old laptop
really struggled on the disk portion
 

Did something happen to your desktop or are you just showcasing your archaeological discovery like we were?  :P
nah just testing my old stuff
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on January 28, 2018, 05:24:01 pm
umm well i re-ran the laptop's test...
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/96764412097.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=96764412097)
switched operating system over to the nvme drive and suddenly the disk mark shot up by 9300 points
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on January 29, 2018, 10:29:13 am
I noticed that since I last posted my benchmark for my home machine, I had updated my graphics card, so new result
(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/96715526036.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=96715526036)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on June 11, 2018, 04:51:41 pm
Provisional Result for new system mid-install, burn-in test

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/103597128350.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=103597128350)

Wow, enabled Intel Graphics and is gets wore??

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/103601929304.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=103601929304)

Finally: Now I can rest until I upgrade to NVMe Drive and newer graphics. :)

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/103763538692.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=103763538692)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on November 24, 2018, 06:15:41 pm
Upgraded my graphics card - unfortunately, some ot the other tests deviated from earlier high marks, so the overall result, while better, is still within 5% of my submitted benchmark, so I don't get to upload it again to the Passmark database. :(

Overall improvement ~ 0.5%
3D Graphics improvement ~ 56%

(https://i.imgur.com/bSZjrH4.png)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on November 25, 2018, 12:52:22 pm
A new mystery build :B

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/111454730664.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=111454730664)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on November 29, 2018, 11:35:32 am
Working on a new build, waiting on my shipment for the RAM and the OS to complete it.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on December 01, 2018, 05:26:31 pm
New home computer build

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/111875960106.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=111875960106)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on December 01, 2018, 06:06:52 pm
New leader on the block ;) Quite an upgrade from the older machine you benchmarked a few years back.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: miquelfire on December 03, 2018, 11:47:50 am
3dMark (https://1drv.ms/f/s!AqMcKER5CDqeo0kQUtKc20J_-HDi) Agrees.
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on December 04, 2018, 10:01:01 am
Did some overclocking and redid the tests and got some interesting results.
 (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/112043842163.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=112043842163)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on December 04, 2018, 10:11:37 am
umm just reran again and random 1000 point gain on disk
(https://i.imgur.com/Qbfwxth.png)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on January 07, 2019, 03:01:33 pm
The Mystery laptop used for low-end Knuckle Cracker game testing

(https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/images/114042835762.png) (https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V9/display.php?id=114042835762)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on February 01, 2019, 01:53:16 pm
Just got a Strix 2070 :D
(https://i.imgur.com/GKH3V7a.png)
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on February 01, 2019, 06:18:15 pm
oh come on, can't you put the right link in? :P
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: ShadowDragon7015 on February 02, 2019, 07:53:33 pm
No because it wont let me post it online  :-\ since i didnt pay the $30 for the testing software
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Karsten75 on February 02, 2019, 09:01:40 pm
They must have closed that loophole where you could get a free 30-day trail
Title: Re: Benchmark results
Post by: Nicant on February 08, 2019, 10:36:26 pm
Here's mine:
\_(ツ)_/