Knuckle Cracker

Creeper World 3 => Upcoming Release Chatter => Topic started by: lich98 on June 24, 2012, 06:29:18 pm

Title: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: lich98 on June 24, 2012, 06:29:18 pm
As stated in the title do you think that CW3 will === awesomeness? If not please post what you think it equals and why! Thanks!
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: thepenguin on June 24, 2012, 06:34:44 pm
of course.

the reason: why not?
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: Cavemaniac on June 25, 2012, 03:30:37 pm

It's a long time since I left school, and you kids with your 'new maths' should feel free to correct me, but I think it's obvious that:

CW3 >= AWESOMENESS

Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: lich98 on June 25, 2012, 08:09:25 pm

It's a long time since I left school, and you kids with your 'new maths' should feel free to correct me, but I think it's obvious that:

CW3 >= AWESOMENESS

no no CW3 >= EPICNESS

See much better.

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: Cavemaniac on June 26, 2012, 05:22:19 am

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P


Javascript?!

I just about mastered Basic - and that was nearly 30 years ago!


Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: lich98 on June 26, 2012, 08:38:09 am

Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P


Javascript?!

I just about mastered Basic - and that was nearly 30 years ago!

...
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: thepenguin on June 26, 2012, 05:11:04 pm
Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P
as a matter of fact, yes.
@caveman,  === means strict equals
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: Cavemaniac on June 26, 2012, 06:22:21 pm
Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P
as a matter of fact, yes.
@caveman,  === means strict equals

Showing my age here, the kids these days use all sorts of crazy talk.

For example, it turns out that 'sick' means 'good'.

It was much easier when I was young - when 'bad' meant good...

 :)

Thanks for the clarification Penguin!
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: lich98 on June 26, 2012, 08:45:41 pm
Also anyone notice the javascript === there? :P
as a matter of fact, yes.
@caveman,  === means strict equals

Showing my age here, the kids these days use all sorts of crazy talk.

For example, it turns out that 'sick' means 'good'.

It was much easier when I was young - when 'bad' meant good...

 :)

Thanks for the clarification Penguin!


I don't believe in all that slang!
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: TrickyDragon on July 05, 2012, 06:34:25 pm
cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
~T0T4L 3P1CN355~
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: TonyP2000 on July 06, 2012, 12:10:32 am
Showing my age here, the kids these days use all sorts of crazy talk.
It was much easier when I was young - when 'bad' meant good...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZErvASwdlU

Sorry, I couldn't resist...
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: hoodwink on August 13, 2012, 12:46:59 pm
cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
~T0T4L 3P1CN355~


Interesting equation you have there.
I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: thepenguin on August 13, 2012, 04:14:26 pm
Interesting equation you have there.
I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".
true, but neither hold up under mathematical analysis:
cw3 > cw + cw2
3* cw > cw*(1+2) = cw*(3)
therefore 3>3, which does not work

cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
3*cw = cw^10*4*cw^2 + mc^2 = 4*cw^12 + mc^2
therefore, cw must be negative, which is not correct.

Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: hoodwink on August 14, 2012, 07:42:31 am
Interesting equation you have there.
I would have just said "cw3 > cw + cw2".
true, but neither hold up under mathematical analysis:
cw3 > cw + cw2
3* cw > cw*(1+2) = cw*(3)
therefore 3>3, which does not work
I was literally saying that creeper world 3 will be better than creeper world 1 and 2 combined... :(
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: 4xC on September 12, 2012, 11:04:38 pm
What hoodwink is saying about the third one smoking the first 2 is something I will always concur with.

Like I say in the blog comments, each game is EASILY the better of them all. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: ashtoin on September 27, 2012, 10:58:26 pm
cw1=cool and inginuitive
cw2=adds minecraft like feel,my 2 fav games
cw3=all the good parts from 1 and 2=EPICNESS X 9999999
i hate it because it wont come out!
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: Chawe800 on September 28, 2012, 06:41:07 pm
I felt CW2 really focused more on gravity and gravity's effects. I personally want to know how CW2 felt like minecraft to you. (I really am curious.)
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: cooltv27 on September 28, 2012, 10:09:45 pm
I felt CW2 really focused more on gravity and gravity's effects. I personally want to know how CW2 felt like minecraft to you. (I really am curious.)

im not sure about why for him exactly, but I would say its because the blocks can be removed, cw2 felt like it is epic to me, not like minecraft
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: 4xC on October 23, 2012, 10:50:24 am
Thank God that removed ground can be re-removed.
Title: Re: Question: Does CW3 = AWESOMENESS?
Post by: Ronini on November 06, 2012, 05:20:17 pm

cw3 = (cw^10 x cw2^2) + mc^2
3*cw = cw^10*4*cw^2 + mc^2 = 4*cw^12 + mc^2
therefore, cw must be negative, which is not correct.



Actually, cw could just aswell be something between 0 an 1. Which would also not be correct, but I just couldn't help myself.